NgsAdvisory
Request a second opinion
TR·EN
NgsAdvisory
Home For Patients For Physicians Molecular Second Opinion What is Menthis NGS Academy About Contact Request a second opinion
TR  ·  EN
NGS Academy

Reading the report is one thing. Interpreting it is another matter entirely.

A physician-led library on molecular (NGS) cancer reports: from a patient's first look at the page to the disciplined reasoning behind a structured second opinion.

Every case is personally reviewed and signed off by Prof. Dr. İbrahim Yıldız, Medical Oncology specialist.

For patients and families For clinicians
Reading depth: Basic Intermediate Advanced

(the same calibration language used in the evidence badges of the IYGAS report)

01 · Start Here

Understanding Your Report

A plain-language starting point. What an NGS report says, and what a specific result means for you — written for patients and families.

A1 Patient

How to Read Your NGS Report

A guided tour through the five most important sections of a 15–30 page report, and the questions to bring to your oncologist.

A2 Patient

Biomarker Explainers

What a single result in your report means, gene by gene. Actionability depends on tumor type and treatment line; these pages show why.

EGFR · activating variants, exon 20, resistance KRAS · G12C, G12D/G12V comparison, co-mutations ALK · fusion, point mutation comparison, RNA testing BRAF V600E · class I, class II/III comparison, strategy by tumor type HER2 (ERBB2) · amplification, mutation, and overexpression comparison MSI-H / dMMR & TMB · immunotherapy signals, Lynch clue

Click any heading above to jump to that gene in the full guide.

02 · Report Interpretation

A Deep Reading of the Report

For clinicians. The main page maps a comprehensive genomic profiling report; the linked pages explain every component that must be interpreted before it informs a decision.

B0 · Ana Sayfa Clinician

How to Read an NGS Report

Beyond the highlighted "actionable" findings: clonality, evidence tier, co-alterations, and the test's limitations, read within the patient's context.

B1 Clinician

Understanding VAF

What variant allele frequency does and doesn't tell you: the clonal vs. subclonal distinction, purity effects, and when the number is misleading.

Coming soon
B2 Clinician

Tumor Purity and NGS Results

Why a low-purity sample suppresses VAF and can under-report real alterations, and how to read past it.

Coming soon
B3 Clinician

Germline and Somatic Variants

Inherited or acquired? A distinction that matters for the patient and family, one that tumor-only panels can blur.

Coming soon
B4 Clinician

Pathogenic, Likely Pathogenic, and VUS

Variant pathogenicity is not the same thing as actionability. What the classification means, and why a VUS is not dismissed.

Coming soon
B5 Clinician

Understanding TMB

What tumor mutational burden counts, the ≥10 mut/Mb threshold, and why it is a gradient rather than a switch.

Coming soon
B6 Clinician

Understanding MSI

Microsatellite instability and mismatch repair deficiency: an immunotherapy signal and a Lynch syndrome clue.

Coming soon
B7 Clinician

Understanding HRD

Homologous recombination deficiency, genomic scars, and what they mean for sensitivity to PARP inhibitors and platinum.

Coming soon
B8 Clinician

Understanding LOH

Loss of heterozygosity: the second hit, a component of HRD scars, and its role at the HLA locus.

Coming soon
B9 Clinician

Actionable and Non-Actionable Alterations

The honest middle category: a biomarker with no matched therapy is a finding to monitor, not a treatment to chase.

Coming soon
B10 Clinician

ctDNA in Clinical Practice

Reading tumor DNA from blood: shedding, VAF, the plasma-first approach, and reconciling liquid with tissue.

Coming soon
03 · Methodology

How We Reason

The framework that turns a report into a strategy: the same logic applied to every case, and how it becomes the output you receive.

C1 Clinician

From Mutation to Clinical Decision

The seven questions between an alteration and a defensible action, and the predictable points where the chain breaks.

C2 Clinician

How We Approach Complex Cases

A step-by-step framework applied to difficult cases: a driver mutation with no matched drug, conflicting tests, a borderline VAF.

C3 Clinician

Understanding the IYGAS Structured Report

How the report is organized: orientation, evidence, decision, counsel, and the calibration layer showing how solid each result is.

C4 Clinician

Why Experts Interpret the Same NGS Report Differently

Why two experienced clinicians can read the same report and reach different conclusions, and how a transparent, structured review makes the reasoning auditable.

C5 Clinician

The Molecular Tumor Board Process

A structured way of asking whether a genomic finding should change treatment; step by step from report to recommendation.

04 · Masterclass

Evidence and Off-Label

The deepest point: grading evidence honestly, and evaluating off-label opportunities with discipline rather than optimism.

D1 Clinician

How We Evaluate Clinical Evidence

Study design, maturity, endpoint quality, effect size, and the single most decisive question: does the evidence match the tumor?

D2 Clinician

How We Evaluate Off-Label Opportunities

Off-label use is not a free pass. The questions an option must clear before it is presented, and what we will not do.

05 · Closing Notes

Mixed Reading

Patient explainers and clinician notes in a single feed: the academy's ideas in practice. Filter by topic or search titles.

J1 Clinician

How to Interpret Your NGS Report: 9 Critical Facts

Actionable variants, negative NGS, CHIP in liquid biopsy, tumor heterogeneity, TMB, and VUS: nine limitations that turn report reading into a real clinical decision.

Do you want your report read correctly?

NGS Advisory evaluates your existing NGS report against current guidelines, checks for gaps such as untested RNA fusions, and delivers a structured, calibrated second opinion.

Disclaimer: NGS Academy is educational. It is general information, not a diagnosis, treatment recommendation, or medical device. Whether a specific result applies to a specific patient is a decision for the treating oncologist. Drug names are kept at the class level; approval status and guidelines can change and should be reverified against primary sources.